Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The bottom line is that Erwin probably knows more about optics than all of us put together, but given his financial arrangements with Leica over the years, there is no way he can or should be trusted as an impartial judge of Leica products. This is not to say that he isn't as honest as a day in June in the Northern Hemisphere is long; it is to say that once one takes money - or product - from a company, one should no longer be considered an impartial judge of anything having to do with that company. On 6/15/12 9:42 AM, "Frank Filippone" <red735i at earthlink.net> wrote: >I take a different approach to Erwin's analysis. I like his scientific >approach, I find his reviews static and un-emotional. However I take his >results with a grain of salt. > >If you want to appear to be uncompromising and above reproach, then you >must >truly be non-paid and non-partisan. Basically a regular Joe Consumer. >And >you must never take on any job from the supplier. > >Erwin does work at times for Leica. He is paid or receives some form of >remunerative compensation from this activity. This then makes me think >his >impartiality is questionable at all times. > >He also has received items for testing/review ahead of the general public. >This again makes him part of the Leica Crew. > >I like his reviews, I read them, I believe in them when technical aspects >come to mind, But do I believe he is impartial? No. > >Frank Filippone >Red735i at earthlink.net > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >