Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Well, this is a huge step backward!
From: lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz)
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:39:14 -0400
References: <04EEBEEB-B129-4376-A920-ED340B9EAEF7@gmail.com> <29817814-1340978491-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1746902132-@b17.c16.bise6.blackberry>
 
The rules may be different if the private property provides public
access; malls are not like homes. I believe the rule is that you can
photograph unless there are signs forbidding it or you are asked to
stop by security.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:01 AM, B. D. Colen <bd at bdcolenphoto.com> wrote:
> A cell phone camera is a camera. A mall is private property, and while on 
> that private property you are entirely at the mercy of the property owner 
> and his/her/its rules. It may not seem right, but this is not the same 
> thing as police or security guard harassment in a public place. Just 
> saying.


-- 
-Lew Schwartz
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Well, this is a huge step backward!)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Well, this is a huge step backward!)