Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Those terms are common to all wikipedia content. I doubt that anyone writes wikipedia articles to make money, so it is of course no different for other types of content. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman (sent from somewhere) On 08/07/2012, at 01.59, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: > I like the photo, but I hate the terms: > > This file is licensed under the Creative > Commons<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Creative_Commons> > Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 > Unported<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en> > license.You are free: > > - *to share* ? to copy, distribute and transmit the work > - *to remix* ? to adapt the work > > Under the following conditions: > > - *attribution* ? You must attribute the work in the manner specified by > the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they > endorse > you or your use of the work). > - *share alike* ? If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you > may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license > to > this one. > > > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Today's featured photo on Wikipedia is by our own Kyle Cassidy: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hera-photo-by-kyle-cassidy.jpg >> >> Good work. >> >> Marty >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > > -- > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information