Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/07/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Back to film!
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:55:46 -0500
References: <856435263.14342281342280813571.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <CC273F31.211E2%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CAFUrs5DZfW34TdK=iwUphkxmD1tFToq5+OjAjxxS=RmHQkXOJw@mail.gmail.com>
On Jul 14, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
> Well, I have several of those too, Mark. When I wrote "old" I meant
> the old 50/2.8 not the modern "new" 50/2.8 Elmar. I'd love to have one
> of those. I keep my eyes open every Friday.
I thought 2.8 always = elmarit
no?
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
In reply to:
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)