Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A portrait for critiquing
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:43:41 +1000
References: <CAMkHw3Y4b6rixZ-1xG1aK3uADNkjL-kH=-xz6D087qWpXT3zxg@mail.gmail.com>

Greg I'll fearlessly step up ;-)
For me the light is not sufficiently directional (tonal variation/modelling
of features) for the BW to work well.
With the disclaimer that it is always possible to do things differently, my
approach here might be to start with a colour/white balance that pleases
you, clean up skin (retouching) and eye detail (white/local contrast/
sharpening)
No woman ever complained of being made too pretty when you develop her
portrait.

Cheers,
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman



On 18 July 2012 11:28, Greg Rubenstein <gcr910 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Have posted a new album with two portraits from the same image (one
> color and the other black and white). Slightly different croppings.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gcr910/Portraits/
>
> A style somewhat out of my comfort zone. Need to do more of this kind of
> thing.
>
> The subject makes it work, even if protesting, good naturedly, "You're
> too close, Greg."
>
> Available window light. No reflectors.
>
> Comments and critiques appreciated. Also curious about color or b & w
> preferences . . . and why.
>
> Thank you for looking.
>
> Greg Rubenstein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from gcr910 at gmail.com (Greg Rubenstein) ([Leica] A portrait for critiquing)