Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To be fair, those of us who see low light usage or a decent FPS as a must would prefer CMOS. That said, I can never understand why all of you rise to Mark's posts on this subject again and again and again. What difference does it make? Use what you want, and what suits you. Why have such a thin skin on such inconsequential banalities? Cheers Jayanand On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:37 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > Well if you get your info from PCWorld, CCD seems more than adequate for > Leica and medium format ;-) That article is primarily about P&S and IQ does > not get much of a mention.... > > Is there any DMR/M8/M9 owner who prefers the IQ of CMOS over CCD? > > john > ________________________________________ > > > > http://www.pcworld.com/article/246931/cmos_is_winning_the_camera_sensor_batt > le_and_heres_why.html or > http://tinyurl.com/c3xaejc > > "CMOS Is Winning the Camera Sensor Battle, and Here's Why" > > The only CCD cameras left: > "When you do find one, it's usually at the very high end of the premium > point-and-shoot market--Canon's PowerShot G12, Nikon's Coolpix P7100, > Olympus's XZ-1, and Panasonic's Lumix LX5, for example--where the potential > user is primarily interested in still-image quality." > > > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >