Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Auto Aperture with R lenses on the new M via the Leica > M adapter
From: scottgregory at mac.com (Scott Gregory)
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:34:32 -0400
References: <CC7E5E0A.23B27%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I guess I find it hard to believe that someone is going to invest $7000 for 
a new M then add the adapter cost to have a solution to use a few R lenses 
after all this time has passed. But what do I know!
Scott

On 2012-09-18, at 5:21 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> As far as the Leica R solution goes in terms of bulk and weight here's
> weight to keep in mind, just from Leica no Nikon:
> Leica M6  560 grams
> Leica M9   585
> Leica M-E  585
> Leica R7    670 
> Leica M     680
> Leica R9    790
> Leica R8    890
> Leica R9 with the LEICA DIGITAL-MODUL-R  1395
> Leica S     1400
> Leica S2    1410
> 
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
>> From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:11:11 -0700
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Auto Aperture with R lenses on the new M via the 
>> LeicaR >
>> M adapter
>> 
>> It would be interesting to see what hardcore Leicaphiles think in terms of
>> size and weight. It's 100g more and we know some Leicaphiles would think
>> that's too much (I recall some people notice the slight height difference
>> between the M6 and M7)
>> 
>> But if you were to use it as a "R-solution," then it's practically svelte
>> in comparison.
>> 
>> Another interesting fact is that this could be THE full frame solution not
>> just for ancient Contarex, but also legions of Zuikoholic, Pentaxian,
>> Contaxer etc.
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:23 PM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net <
>> wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>> I'll be very interested to see how the new sensor and processor perform.
>>> <<<
>>> 
>>> Likewise... and there are a few other things I'd have to check before I'd
>>> consider buying it: viewfinder resposiveness, sensitivity of the focus
>>> peaking at working apertures, robustness of the add-on viewfinder, cost 
>>> of
>>> spare viewfinders, and the placement of the shutter release.  I've become
>>> addicted to the shutter release on the front of the DMR's hand grip.
>>> 
>>> I'd rather the EVF replaced the rangefinder.  I would be 100% dependant 
>>> on
>>> it and if it were enclsed within the body shell it would be a lot less
>>> vulnerable to getting whacked by a tree limb, snagged by a vine or bashed
>>> against a rock.  Perhaps some future version.
>>> 
>>> Doug Herr
>>> Birdman of Sacramento
>>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
>>> http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Auto Aperture with R lenses on the new M via the Leica > M adapter)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Auto Aperture with R lenses on the new M via the Leica > M adapter)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Auto Aperture with R lenses on the new M via the Leica > M adapter)