Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:03:08 +0530
References: <CAF8hL-HNfVNYGWcvWd_NaK5-=czJ1OeSUAtVJcTSXQq=gRSU+Q@mail.gmail.com> <58B25DA9-7569-47B1-BA43-7E9888895533@gmail.com> <CAE3QcF53ubVi6+xK2p=Txkzb0pkyDP4-h9KQS_4V7MCEaMZ8Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-GaTsc31yM9TS9vpNjEc4v1Xc2H5iTOgHRBZjPW4Ocz7A@mail.gmail.com> <59F0B05C-247E-4D44-B917-A1DEB9B2649D@gmail.com> <CAF8hL-EsJ_NLd4HzVW3taVCg6gNrr+UMrprrAC9aWGKefXWhow@mail.gmail.com>

Taiko is predictable, so it would not be too difficult with an MF body.
Street is unpredictable, so is more difficult for me - I always add the
caveat, if you notice, because my eyes are not up to the task of focusing
MF lenses wide open or thereabouts. I see very little point in using Leica
lenses and stopping down to say, f8 to compensate - I might as well use a
Nikon equivalent, the results will be pretty close. I have just bought a
Zeiss Distagon 25mm f2 in Nikon mount, which I found during testing it out
was pretty accurate using the D800E and the "green dot" focus confirmation.
I will give it a twirl on Saturday, and see how it goes, using both the
green dot and hyperfocal focusing. I actually got this mainly for
landscapes/panoramas, with a tripod, where all these disadvantages sort of
disappear.
Cheers
Jayanand



On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> 
wrote:

> Depending on the type of street action. I can even do taiko using the m9.
> Although for wildlife action, i'd agree with you, unless it's Doug behind
> the camera :-)
> On Sep 19, 2012 7:23 PM, "Jayanand Govindaraj" <jayanand at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
> > If you are shooting handheld, street or wildlife action, that I normally
> > do, I need autofocus. Even on the Fuji, which has a decent EVF. The only
> > other option is hyperfocal for street.
> > Cheers
> > Jayanand
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On 20-Sep-2012, at 7:43 AM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If the evf is good enough, AF is not needed.
> > >
> > > Right now I can't afford a Leica lenscap, but if my business gets as
> well
> > > as it hopes, then anything is possible
> > > On Sep 19, 2012 7:10 PM, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I will. And different auto focus cameras for when I want that too.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Geoff
> > >> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 20 September 2012 11:51, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at 
> > >> gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> After all this passionate analysis, I wonder how many of us in the
> > group
> > >>> will actually will buy this all singing all dancing machine called
> the
> > >>> Leica M? I know I might have if only it had autofocus - without is a
> > non
> > >>> starter with my eyes being what they are!
> > >>> Cheers
> > >>> Jayanand
> > >>>
> > >>> Sent from my iPad
> > >>>
> > >>> On 20-Sep-2012, at 7:06 AM, Richard Man <richard at 
> > >>> richardmanphoto.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> ... and why not?! Leica can afford to make expensive full frame
> small
> > >>> size
> > >>>> telephone for the new M, with EVF.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This is like the ultimate camera. Want small size? Use a small 35 or
> > >> 50.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Want to use it in low light? You have all these 'lux and Nocti
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Want to use it for telephoto? Start with the R adapter, and then
> they
> > >>> will
> > >>>> sell you even more newer and better lens, designed for the M...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Leica Users Group.
> > >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Leica Users Group.
> > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Leica Users Group.
> > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)