Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/10/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 21:04:38 +0930
References: <CA+yJO1BHosn7aBeqMjGan0FNnExKHG-3Md3N65GP2pPPpnRu+A@mail.gmail.com> <CABmfTOXBnU6ySs9VmSJ9zPQam_5eoELsJzx5aSFbN4kgmkaP-w@mail.gmail.com> <CA+yJO1Ccf4oM9RZbUjPObQbhBr4c-qnr7ECHDv6C7c2UgRgnfg@mail.gmail.com>
>> The tonality and detail from the MM wins hands down for me Tina.
> Me, too, Marty. I can tell a big difference.
It was a comparison like this which I did that convinced me that the
MM was both worth it, and pretty much the machine I'd been looking for
since digital appeared in a useful form.
Marty
In reply to:
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)