Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I just thought out that no matter the scanner, it is still the same scanned image format from either a SWC or a 500 neg. the scanner has no idea....and therefore should give the same quality result regardless of what took the image.... I have no idea why the results were different.... except the lens is different.....thus your conclusion. Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of John McMaster Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 4:55 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK Native 3200dpi scans (3 passes) on a Minolta Dimage Scan Multi Pro, the detail in a 49MP (7000 pixels square) image was not as sharp/detailed as my digital Ms (albeit only 18MP), tonality is a different thing ;-) However, for me, the M Monochrom fills that gap. John > -----Original Message----- > > Explain more about your comment of the 3200dpi scans.......... What > is different? Was the scan done in native mode (not the total of some > 4x800DPI or other math assisted scans?) > > I understand that you had the body checked out.... I agree that this > should have ensured the body was OK..... > > Note: SWC lenses ( 38mm Biogon) is certainly one of the best volume > made lenses ever created.....and wed permanently to a body is a killer combo! > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > > 3200dpi scans are a different matter IME. The 500C/M had been back to > Hasselblad UK for servicing. > > john > > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information