Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lluis, I was basing my comment on their definition of "content": 4. By "content" we mean anything you or other users post on Facebook that would not be included in the definition of information. For the definition of "information": 3. By "information" we mean facts and other information about you, including actions taken by users and non-users who interact with Facebook. In clause 4 the word "anything" caught my eye. I also appreciate any opinions. I haven't made a research project out of this since there doesn't seem to be an overwhelming demand for my photos, but still - what's mine is mine as much as possible these days. Ken -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Lluis Ripoll Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:23 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] simple intellectual property question I've never post a picture in Facebook, I've always post a link, AFAIK a link don't give them any sublicense right.... I'll appreciate your opinions Cheers Lluis El 01/02/2013, a las 23:39, Ken Carney escribi?: > I think this is clear, but I would appreciate any corrections. The > Facebook terms of use state that for any IP content that I post, I > retain ownership but grant a royalty-free sublicense. From the > definition of "content", it appears that if I post a link to one of my > photos on Facebook, I have granted the sublicense for that image, the > same as if I had uploaded the image to Facebook. Correct? Thanks for any help. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information