Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark
From: red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 22:54:07 -0800
References: <000b01ce01d6$7bde04e0$739a0ea0$@verizon.net> <CD336EED.4AA7%mark@rabinergroup.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9AC99D370@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>
Best look at your prices again.... they were at most, several hundred, not
$1K.
Most of the cameras you list date to the 70's...... I own/ed most.
But that is all digression....
A $2800 one lens camera is really a camera for the collector or rich
oligarch, not the advanced amateur or pro.
Again, my opinion.
Frank Filippone
Red735i at verizon.net
> Frank I'm used to compact quality cameras costing a grand 20 or 30
> years ago with a fixed lens as were a lot of people I knew. And the
> list of those cameras I've typed out a few times.
> The Minox 35 GT. Or Minox 35s
> Contax T. Rollei 35m, Olympus XA
Replies:
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark)
In reply to:
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark)