Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]But for now, we tip our hats to Metabones for releasing a product that accomplishes what many had thought nearly http://www.dpreview.com/articles/2667195592/first-impressions-metabones-speed-booster . On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i op verizon.net> wrote: > Thanks for the lesson..... > > Now maybe a 35 f0.47 sounds good, but only if you own a Nocti to begin > with..... > > More practical for a greater segment of the market is......a 50 Summilux > with this gizmo... > > Imagine $600 + 50 Summilux = 35mm Noctilux... now there is something I > can sink my teeth into.... > > If only they made one for the M Mount.... > > Frank Filippone > Red735i op verizon.net > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net op leica-users.org [mailto: > lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net op leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Howard > Ritter > Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 11:44 AM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] speed booster > > Well, no. But a 35mm f/0.47, yes. > > The Metabones is a focal reducer, the opposite of a tele-extender. Such > are well known to astroimagers for increasing the field of view of a > telescope and the brightness of the image it produces. If you use a > positive lens to reduce the effective focal length of an objective without > restricting the aperture, you have lowered the f-ratio. And that's what the > Metabones does: reduce the focal length by a factor of 0.71, which is > approximately = v2/2. Since the brightness of an image at a given f.l. > varies with the square of the aperture (therefore inversely with the square > of the f-ratio), reducing the f.l. by a factor of v2/2 thus brightens the > image by a factor of 2, or a full f-stop. > > Question is, does the Metabones have the throat (entrance pupil I believe) > that would be required to accommodate the huge light cone from the > full-open Nocti? > > It's related to the annoying fact that no passive optical assistance will > make an object appear brighter than it would be to the naked eye at a > distance where the object would appear the same size as the optic makes it > appear. No free lunches in optics. Gaining any reduction in f-stop without > decreasing the f.l., now that would be magic! > > howard > > On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i op verizon.net> wrote: > > > Can you imagine a 50mm F0.47 lens? > > > > Oh please, an M mount on both sides? > > Pretty please? > > > > On a similar note.... I just found my Komura Telemore II 2x Extender > > for M cameras..... need to take it out for a test with the M9.... if > > it focuses well, WOW! > > I can stand some image degradation.. but out of focus drives me nuts.... > > It came with a Komura LTM-M adapter... to which I have several genuine > > and non genuine adapters... must try a few to see if one works better > > than the others.... > > > > Frank Filippone > > Red735i op verizon.net > > > > any thoughts on this :" > > > > http://www.metabones.com/info/105-info/154-speed-booster > > > > brgds > > Simon > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >