Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf
From: cedric.agie at gmail.com (Cedric Agie)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:52:59 +0100
References: <12FD31BAD81A4DEA9F507C8C1EC123BC@jimnichols> <366505E6-C56D-4DB9-B6B7-7203503705B7@frozenlight.eu> <C55D0308242D40DCB336FB23961CEA78@jimnichols> <57DC76A1-5C68-4029-A93B-2AF10C8BBF09@cartersxrd.net> <0F987371965B438096A45440035D7F8E@jimnichols>

I'm certainly not an expert of older Leitz lenses, in short I'm not
really fond of Leica lenses made before the discovery by Leitz of new
elements (i.e. high refraction obtained with Lanthan etc) and
multicoating. As we all know you cannot judge a lens from a Computer
screen or a television set, but looking at the brillant colors,
contrasts and sharpness etc in these excellent pictures,  I would
rather have the impression that they where taken with a Summicron
lens. Wich could be the case as I mentionned before.

At the end of the Summitar 50 mm production Leitz produced a small
number of these new lenses under the name Summitar, but in fact these
where issued with the new Summicron formulas to test the market. Only
the serial number could give an indication. They used the same trick
with the first Summilux 50mm 1.4 lenses that arrived under the the
name of the former Summarit 50mm f1.5.

My advise; never sell such a lens.

Cedric

2013/2/20 Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net>:
> I checked the CameraQuest site.  That is a lot of money to invest in gear
> with limited usefulness!  Might be fun, though.
>
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "RicCarter" <ric at cartersxrd.net>
>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:53 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf
>
>
>> you can get back some of the old fun by strapping one of the CV ultrawides
>> and accessory finders on the the III
>>
>> the 12 is great fun on it
>>
>> ric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:40 PM, "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols at lighttube.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The main reason I gave up on the IIIf was that my eyes and glasses just
>>> don't perform like they did when I was younger.  The small RF/VF windows 
>>> are
>>> a pain for me.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Reply from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)