Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Bokeh SchmokehŠ .
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:26:22 -0600
References: <02BA6A2448D4400BB9DFF1316A93F1C1@billHP> <CD540D48.5C23%mark@rabinergroup.com>

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:

> The people who don't come to NYC are often people in the south say for
> instance Texas


The print edition of the NYT I get here in Natchitoches is printed in
Dallas.


> and the reason is because the NYT's is here and these are far
> far right wingers who hate everybody and everything and pride themselves
> for
> it. Also pride themselves for being as stupid as possible. I think they
> call
> them "good old boys".
>
> In reality half the people in the US view the NYTimes as being too
> Conservative and the other half too Liberal.
> I'd just Wiki'd this a few weeks ago but I bet I'm darned close. 50 50.
>
>
> On 2/27/13 6:54 PM, "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:
>
> > Is your front lawn ever defaced by a burning cross?
>
> -----Original
> > Message-----
> From: Tina Manley
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:41 PM
> To:
> > Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh Schmokeh?.
>
> I subscribe to the
> > NYT and have it delivered daily to my farm in York, SC.
> It is an essential
> > part of our lives and I sincerely hope it can hang on
> in these times of
> > newspaper closings and consolidations.  Besides, we use
> all of that paper as
> > mulch in the garden!
>
> Tina
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Bill Pearce
> > <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:
>
> > In his defense, Mr. Pogue is a "Tech Writer"
> > for the New York Times,
> > either a propaganda and misinformation rag if you
> > are a member of the far
> > right, or a highly respected newspaper, if you ever
> > voted for a Democrat.
> > I
> > have read several of his columns (gust that makes
> > me a liberal) and I have
> > found them to be generally better written than the
> > one on sensor size,
> > explaining complex things so many can understand.
> > Although I don't care
> > for
> > this particular effort, where he takes a stand
> > on something that really
> > hasn't been that much of an issue, his reviews are
> > generally better
> > written
> > than most. Perhaps the fact that as a journalist
> > working for such a
> > prestigious newspaper he is presumed to have at the very
> > least graduated
> > from an accredited institution of higher learning, where
> > most
> > reviewers/bloggers have generally completed fifth grade English. His
> >
> > comments are generally insightful. I guess when you throw as much
> against>
> > the wall as Pogue, some things will fail to stick.
> >
> > -----Original
> > Message----- From: Geoff Hopkinson
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:57
> > PM
> > To: Leica Users Group
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh Schmokeh?.
> >
> >
> > Mr
> > Pogue is apprently a technology blogger rather than a photographer? But
> > he
> > has reviewed "hundreds of cameras". He doesn't enhance his
> >
> > qualifications/credibility being "confident" that he is right and
> quoting>
> > Google and YouTube in his reply to those cantankerous on-line
> >
> > photographers.
> >
> >
> > *If you want to take more interesting pictures,
> > stand
> > in front of more interesting stuff* -- Joe McNally
> >
> > Cheers
> > Geoff
> >
> > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> >
> >
> > On 28 February 2013 05:26, Steve Barbour
> > <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  OK, so call it out of focus
> > blurring.....
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.**com/2013/02/21/blurry-**
> >>
> > backgrounds-big-sensors-and-**bokeh/?ref=personaltechemail&**
> >>
> > nl=technology&emc=edit_ct_**20130221<
> http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/21
> >
> /blurry-backgrounds-big-sensors-and-bokeh/?ref=personaltechemail&nl=technology
> > &emc=edit_ct_20130221>
> >>
> >>
> > ______________________________**_________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See
> >
> >>
> > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/l
> > istinfo/lug>for
> >> more information
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ______________________________**_________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See
> >
> >
> > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/l
> > istinfo/lug>for
> > more information
> >
> >
> > ______________________________**_________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See
> >
> >
> > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/l
> > istinfo/lug>for
> > more information
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Tina Manley,
> > ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica
> > Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> > information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users
> > Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
Natchitoches, Louisiana

USA


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Bokeh SchmokehŠ .)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Bokeh SchmokehŠ .)
In reply to: Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] Bokeh Schmokeh….)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Bokeh Schmokeh? .)