Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Steves shot of the bike at iso 3200 and 6400 are grainless and there is no mention of how much noise reduction he may have used which I'd get to be "a solid amount" would love to see them with no noise reduction and or low noise reduction or just know how much they used... as when I see a file with zero noise at 64000 iso I don't feel like I'm looking at anything. Personally when I use noise reduction I scale it back so there is just a slight hint of noise left. That way I don't feel like I'm just leaving them a Fig Newton of my own imagination. This review has more shots don't in blazing sunlight then I've ever seen in my life. A review of this camera deserves to be taking it for a dangerous walk around the back after the sun goes down. Call it street photography. I'd be happy with it. It seem to me the big reason to get the camera in the first place. On 3/12/13 5:25 PM, "Doug Herr" <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote: > Henning Wulff wrote: > >>>> > I would say that that major improvement in the new M is the speed. I never > have to wait for the camera, as I do with the M9. If I do single shots, > which > is 99% of the time, I really can't outshoot it, whereas the M9 often > required > me to wait 30 seconds until the buffer cleared, which is a long time. > Reviewing shots is also much faster. > <<< > > Steve Huff's non-technical review: > http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2013/03/11/the-leica-m-240-real-world-camera-rev > iew-2013-by-steve-huff/ > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/