Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:03:31 -0700
References: <0497DC39-8C0B-4CB6-B751-DB29FB2168C3@archiphoto.com> <E99666E9-516A-4DBF-83B3-53951C767F26@gmail.com> <021775B4F6274086B02B450E36470BD5@billHP> <D95E3889-D314-4678-BF3A-E2234AF3A835@archiphoto.com> <506D9C53-DF5D-47F9-A931-6B46516880FC@gmail.com> <E4B22E57-3EEC-48B1-81B9-C4F6FB641656@archiphoto.com> <21F41098-87CC-4271-AD43-7CF042912383@gmail.com> <CAE3QcF7VfLzWqaVO+2C3hDFrS0V4D+yTHYt98c8+E_GLKqqpRQ@mail.gmail.com> <39034806-30CD-4BE9-9C1D-0E14856CA1B6@gmail.com> <CAE3QcF6EmgCb+5C-SQiv_dmckRM3cmU8T7_hh_rbrk82coSCOA@mail.gmail.com>

They work better if you stick a red dot on the front. I did that and the 
formerly used Olympus finder works fine. I'm considering getting some white 
paint to put the appropriate info on the front. Maybe then it will refresh 
faster. I wished it worked as well as essentially the same finder in the 
Olympus OM-D, which does have the faster refresh and needed no cosmetic 
updates to be compatible.

Henning


On 2013-03-14, at 3:51 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote:

> Styling only I am told. I have read one or two reports that they don't fit
> well into the M hotshoe (too tight?) but others that they work fine.
> 
> *If you want to take more interesting pictures,
> stand in front of more interesting stuff* -- Joe McNally
> 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
> 
> On 15 March 2013 07:31, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> No Steve. Olympus supply the EVF that Leica Camera markets. Leica Camera
>>> execs have already said that it is the same. This EVF is already in use
>> for
>>> the X2. It is not actually new just for the M
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> any difference between the Leica branded one and the Oly one?
>> 



In reply to: Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 3200 ISO with the new M240)