Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thought it was standard industry practice to have multiple limited editions. I collect photographs, and I have noticed this tendency wherever I have looked. Another blog about the court ruling: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2013/03/sobel-vs-eggleston-the-decision.html A view I agree with and which to me makes terrific sense: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2013/04/limited-edition-photographs.html Cheers Jayanand On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at me.com> wrote: > I found this an interesting ruling on limited edition prints: > > http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/04/03/judge-eggleston-dispute-collector > > Gerry > > Gerry Walden > +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or > +44 (0)797 287 7932 > www.gwpics.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >