Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hoppy you should now by now that on the LUG you don't tout the wonderfulness of the new Leica M coming out you criticize anyone who would suggest that it has any advantages over the older model you have in hand. Try buying a small shovel and digging a small hole and putting your head in it. You will have the same view as the average person on the list. Do they have ostriches in the land down under? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostrich Yes I see they have escaped from the Ostrich farms. I'm sure they are not planning an insurrection in the Outback. On 4/14/13 7:10 PM, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote: > It is an odd atmosphere in that report. I think overly harsh commentary on > the M8 and M9 whilst ascribing almost mythical properties to the M. Some of > that is quite contradictory, for example the rangefinder function is meant > to have improved accuracy in the M over the predecessors. As far as I know > it is the same mechanism. > > For me it is socially interesting that an article largely lauding the new > camera is being discussed for its limitations or the author's competence > where conventional view might be that a forum with some Leica enthusiasts > might praise it. Again I know nothing of the author's photography to judge > by. He may well have a body of fine work for all I know. > > The ME M9 M price comparisons are interesting. An M will cost about the > same as an M9 did, here at least and the ME is a significant saving for all > of the performance of the M9. But put the cameras, figures, buyer wants and > expectations side by side and it all changes. > > I still have my M9..... but just because I'm waiting on delivery of my M > ;-) I view the new design as an M9 with some of its characteristics much > improved (operating speed including lossless DNG compression in camera, > very low light performance, wides performance (in theory) some incremental > improvement (24MP and a number of ergonomic changes) and some options added > that I may use (other focus modes) and some of no relevance to me (video). > The additional focus modes will be an absolute boon...or curse for > measuring of the RF calibration and lens characteristics. > > > > *If you want to take more interesting pictures, > stand in front of more interesting stuff* -- Joe McNally > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > On 15 April 2013 08:45, Paul Roark <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Interesting thread. >> >> I have a friend who is not on the list and has been eyeing a Leica. I >> shoot with him occasionally and we've been looking at the very impressive >> results of his Sigma Fovian cameras. He sees what I do with the M9 and is >> very interested in getting a Leica. He read the LL piece and is in the >> market segment that, first, might be very interested in making the leap; >> but, the second effect of the article is to rather trash the M9. He could >> get the M9 (but without manual frameline selection?) with the ME. The net >> effect of the LL article is probably going to be negative for both him and >> Leica, since he does not feel comfortable with the M240 price, but might >> be >> OK with the ME price. >> >> I, frankly, have suggested the ME, and I'm not trading my M9 in for an >> M240 >> -- maybe next time. >> >> Paul >> www.PaulRoark.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/