Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is Eggleston in the right? What is the meaning of "limited edition"?
From: dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:29:07 -0400
References: <CD8B0128.7E10%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I used to think that Adams' work in dorm room posters was exaggerated and 
artificially accentuated, especially since when I was growing up, we had a 
signed Moon over Half Dome hanging in our house (which by comparison was a 
bit cream-colored and not so, ahem, "HDR" as the repros).  But the older I 
get, and the more I read about Adams, the more convinced I am that he would 
have been a huge Lightroom fan...

By the way, I've always felt that the issue with numbered editions is not 
promising to do so few; it's the suggestion that you would promise to do *so 
many* prints.

Dante

On Apr 10, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> My unfortunate example which implies an Edward Weston complicates and blurs
> the issue as his sons Cole and Brett did his prints after he was stricken
> with Parkinson's under his rather close supervision and they go for tens of
> thousands and no one complains. That kind of thing like this pretty much
> stands alone.  Also my term" cranking out" does not fill the bill as you 
> say
> as to make a serious print is not at all factory like and requires a lot of
> time and water and wasted paper.
> 
> Ansel A. was excited by the idea that after he was dead people would be
> making prints from his not destroyed negs with "Laser beams."
> In other words technologies away from the tradition darkroom slodge and
> drudge. - involving stuff we can only imagine.
> It did not worry him that they may not in effect do the in effect dodging
> and burning right or if the executors of his estate lost money.
> I think as a result they made have made not lost money -  you can scan  one
> of his negs on the latest cutting edge scanner they'll invent tomorrow.
> This excites not offends me. And I'll gong to emulate that approached.
> Assuming that when the time comes anybody gives a rats ass about my  body
> of work.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/10/13 10:40 AM, "Lottermoser George" <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Apr 10, 2013, at 4:14 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>> 
>>> Why buy Pepper #6 for huge bucks if the artist is still alive cranking
>>> them out? Or his son is?
>> 
>> Except that "cranking out" dismisses the actual amount of time and 
>> materials
>> required to make a print which its creator would actually sign.
>> 
>> What is the total number of Pepper #6 prints in existence?
>> How many prints of Pepper #6 did Edward Weston make and sign himself?
>> How many did another family member make and sign?
>> 
>> I'd guess that Pepper #6 prints
>> in fine condition
>> signed by a Weston
>> remain relatively rare.
>> Why?
>> Because it's not all that easy to make a fine print.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford) ([Leica] Is Eggleston in the right? What is the meaning of "limited edition"?)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Is Eggleston in the right? What is the meaning of "limited edition"?)