Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think Lloyd is the new Ken Rockwell ;-) www.digilloyd.com john ________________________________________ Here is another take from a Nikon List: Lloyd Chambers writes: Adobe Creative Cloud: Lopsided Legal Agreement http://macperformanceguide.com/blog/2013/20130508_1a-Adobe-legal-agreement.html and: Adobe Creative Cloud: The Main Point http://macperformanceguide.com/blog/2013/20130509_1-AdobeCloud-TheBigDeal.html Cheers Jayanand On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:08 AM, R. Clayton McKee <rcmphoto at yahoo.com>wrote: > If it's not all local, then their line about being able to use it when > you're not connected to the Net is a blatant (and actionable) falsehood. > > The only thing that can logically be set on a remote is a verification > that the copy is licensed... and those things have been crackable since > probably the second day that the model was released. > > Personally I have no problem with the new model, and I'm not interested in > cracking it (even if I could, which I can't). I won't be buying in, as > there are already several more than adequate alternatives for me, but it's > well within Adobe's rights to decide that they don't want people like me > (or anyone who asks me) as customers. > > > > R. Clayton McKee > PhotoJournalist > from somewhere just south of somewhere else... > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> > > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > Cc: > > Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 7:05 AM > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Richard Man > > <richard at richardmanphoto.com>wrote: > > > >> BTW, I highly doubt that this cannot be cracked. In fact, I am willing > to > >> bet $100,000,000,000 that within a year after production, CS7 will be > >> cracked. > >> > > > > Your machine will probably have to access random pieces of code over the > > net. Since the entire program won't reside locally, it'll be essentially > > crack proof. (My guess, of course.) > > > > -Lew Schwartz > >