Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 06:35:51 +0000
References: <CDBC953F.9A35%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CDBC9722.9A3B%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Yet again you bring up 'commercial photography', how many images do you show 
that come under that banner? Why should others be any different?

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Having just contact sheet googled "commercial photography"
> http://tinyurl.com/cyhbh23
> I'm counting the shots in which everything in the shot is not in perfect 
> focus.
> I'm getting about one out of 6 or 7. The m&m's. And the bottle of smart
> water.
> About one shot on each row.
> 
> 
> On 5/18/13 2:17 AM, "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
> > The super selective focus effect is not really on option for most work
> > commercial photographers get. Clients want too see more than a sliver
> > of stuff in focus. Every once in a while the sliver thing in focus
> > thing has had good photojournalist effect for me but in general I've
> > had to use it sparingly. Though in most cases I have to admit it just 
> > doesn't
> occur to me.
> > I try to get most everything in focus most of the time.
> > I remember in the college darkroom the people who shot everything wide
> > open were the ones who didn't know what the other small set of numbers
> > meant on their lens. The depth of field numbers. So controlling that
> > was not their concern. Especially if it led to not getting the fastest
> > shutter speed why bother figuring that out?. To me it did not seem
> > like low craft it seemed like total lack of all craft or care. They
> > didn't get the time of day from most of us.
> >
> >
> > On 5/18/13 12:59 AM, "Alan Magayne-Roshak" <amr3 at uwm.edu> wrote:
> >
> >>  On May 17, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> F 5.6 and be there.
> >>> At 100th of a second. That's what I'm set at 24 hours a day. If I'm
> >>> not set at f8 and be there.
> >>
> ==========================================================
> ===================>>
> =
> >>
> ==========================================================
> ====
> >> Have the opposite preferences.  I like large apertures (and lenses
> >> 50mmm and up), where you can isolate the subject from the background.
> >> I used Panatomic-X a lot so I could shoot at f/4 or wider (with
> >> filters) in bright sun.  What I like about a larger format is the 
> >> smaller DoF.
> >>
> >> Alan
> >>
> >> Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer University of
> >> Wisconsin-Milwaukee Photo Services
> >> (Retired)
> >> UPAA POY 1978
> >> amr3 at uwm.edu
> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
> >>


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?)