Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I should hope so. The "public interest" is in no way served by assertion of a right of private individuals to surreptitiously photograph other private and innocent individuals within their own domiciles without their prior consent. What happens on the street is public and fair game for photographers. What happens in the home stays in the home. ?howard On May 26, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at me.com> wrote: > I read about this guys work elsewhere and my immediate thought was that he > was skating on very thin ice legally. It will be interesting to see the > outcome of this, but in my eyes it is a very clear case of invasion of > privacy, and I feel that even the defence of 'in the public interest' will > fail here if he attempts to invoke it. > > Gerry