Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 10:06:36 -0700
References: <CAE3QcF6C=Tozcs7Qe95rP-B2bhUmXzj6Ag7QBc5RXW4rD-HPTA@mail.gmail.com> <CDC87893.A2E1%mark@rabinergroup.com>

it looks like to be a zoom aps-c type camera? remember minilux and minilux
zoom!!


On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at 
rabinergroup.com>wrote:

> We could take bets.
> We need to learn to see not what's OUTSIDE the box
> We need to learn to see not what's INSIDE the box
> Me I'm putting it in writing right here that I think its a full frame
> compact Leica.
> The Leica  X series has been put in a shadow by the Sony full frame compact
> NEX RX1. This is not a position Leica is going to let itself be in very
> long.
> They are going to keep the X series a 1.5 crop and come up with a new
> series
> for the full frame.
> Perhaps the Y series!
> Then we have Leica X Y chromosomes and coordinates both!
>
> To me this is history which just had not gotten around to happening yet.
> And
> will happy July whatever.
> If we were sitting around a table with our cameras stacked in the middle
> with a pitcher of beer and a pizza it would be less of a deal as its just
> blowing off words. But this is words in writing on the LUG.
> And in the release date I'm looking forward to doing an "I told you so"
> thing. In the least annoying way possible of course.
> And starting to save up for one.
>
> As far as price point goes the X2 goes for 2 grand
> The NEX RX1 goes fro three grand.
> I think the Leica full frame compact Y Chromosome might go for $3,400.9
> USD.
> It would not be seemly for them to undercut Sony.
> If its interchanble glass it could go for 4 grand.
> In other words; a lot more than the bulk of us are going to spend with our
> toy cameras are just great mentality.
>
>
> On 5/25/13 1:05 AM, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Soo not much George I guess ;-) except of course for the cadre of folks
> who
> > have some clues as to what is inside the box....... No end of speculation
> > elsewhere.
> > Regarding my rumour remark, I was just talking in general about the link
> > being to a rumour site. No offence meant to you. Not all of the list
> > follows the official Leica sources regularly ;-)
> >
> >
> > *Breathe in, breathe out, move on* -- Jimmy Buffett
> >
> > NO ARCHIVE
> >
> > Cheers
> > Geoff
> > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> >
> >
> > On 25 May 2013 13:54, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes. I receive the announcements.
> >> I didn't say or suggest it was a rumor.
> >> Though I, nor anyone else that I know or have read on any list,
> >> Has a single spec on the "M mini M"
> >> Nice looking box.
> >>
> >> S-o-o-o-o w h a t ?
> >>
> >> a note off the iPad, George
> >>
> >> On May 24, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's not a rumour, George.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] REASONS why leica is so slow with M)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)