Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Mini m
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:49:11 +1000
References: <F6CC0EDD-1F48-4A39-B76E-43357BD202F7@aol.com> <CAE3QcF5E8DFTCtsGXsk5PWLWtV0Az2S-v7bfo3P2kBjq9ukumg@mail.gmail.com> <DD5113CE-50E6-4F10-A41E-1E7E0B571502@comcast.net> <CAE3QcF7v0o8YSdPRaaTL4A=6wSyUQUv2hJRXAYNCb6a1sCHHBA@mail.gmail.com> <A4D628F1-4656-4553-A185-8DEBF9CF3677@mac.com>

And last time I bet beer against Chris it was about the R10 and I had to
pay up!
On May 28, 2013 1:43 PM, "Chris Williams" <zoeica at mac.com> wrote:

> I would bet a case of beer. Fuji is trying to compete with Leica,not hold
> hands. Besides, Fuji likes to make Hasselblads :)
>
>
>
> Chris Williams
> 504-231-6261
> www.zoeicaimages.net
>
> Sent from my iholga
>
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 11:39 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Well I would bet beer against a rebadged Fujifilm camera with an M mount
> ;-)
> > Guessing is fun. Not long until the 11th. I am going to stay out of the
> web
> > groups for a few days from then ;-)
> >
> >
> > *Breathe in, breathe out, move on* -- Jimmy Buffett
> >
> > Cheers
> > Geoff
> > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> >
> >
> > On 28 May 2013 13:32, Richard Taylor <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Sooooo, Geoff...  anything else you'd care to share with us?   ;-)
> >>
> >> Dick
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On May 27, 2013, at 8:05 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Nope ;-)
> >>> On May 28, 2013 10:03 AM, "Lawrence Zeitlin" <lrzeitlin at aol.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> My guess is that the Leica mini m is simply a rebaged and cosmetically
> >>>> altered Fuji x, possibly with an M mount. Leica and Fuji have had a
> long
> >>>> relationship. Remember that the first Leica digitals were Fujis. The
> >>>> Digilux was a Fuji MX-700, the Digilux Zoom, a Fuji MX-1700, and the
> >> Diglux
> >>>> 4.3, a Fuji 4700 Zoom. Back in the film days Leica had a relationship
> >> with
> >>>> Minolta. The Leica CL was a Minolta product.
> >>>>
> >>>> What better, cheaper, and more expedient way to fill a marketing void
> >> than
> >>>> simply putting your name on someone else's product.
> >>>>
> >>>> Larry Z
> >>>>
> >>>> ______________________________**_________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
> >> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for more information
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from zoeica at mac.com (chris williams) ([Leica] Leica Mini m)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at aol.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Leica Mini m)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Leica Mini m)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Leica Mini m)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Leica Mini m)
Message from zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] Leica Mini m)