Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] a photographer sued
From: john.nebel at csdco.com (John Nebel)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:58:34 -0600
References: <CAEve6Xiz92RtAZd9u_FpBd2+w9nmsKCPux1OWbQ6LMtwofUb9w@mail.gmail.com> <CDC8640F.A2C1%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CABmfTOWWEscjvf3k3mbQv3sTSn0E+uFEcVrHi7=oho-hR710sg@mail.gmail.com> <7C585A4F-C9A6-4111-9B75-FBBB7C9F05BA@gmail.com> <CAFuU78f7MQsyP1Q6NAT5bhU32ENRHaNAj8YZpJXVCyNgQ84PpQ@mail.gmail.com> <AF0D1B0B-0931-4723-8DBE-D94B67214A54@mac.com> <6823D73FB6A047D19AA7EAC075A40598@billHP> <CDFB3CD7-119F-476F-BADA-8A7290178E30@earthlink.net> <BFBABCB6-D35B-48EF-BB93-EE3639932BDC@mac.com> <D557C82F-4475-49E1-A628-D7080678B804@mac.com> <0C69D2BEE8F34FE581214AF3E326EE0D@syneticfeba505> <01fc01ce5c97$7617c750$624755f0$@cox.net> <9BA40B5D-817E-4A46-8238-CBEBE70D28C0@mac.com> <CA+yJO1DXBc4zX00+4C1zMQRNkmn2mnr+PVh+KN6YY4W7hp4oQA@mail.gmail.com> <FED277D6-30B0-4BEA-955C-A296AA0A8DC8@mac.com> <CAFfkXxvUDJUxJTmJ_FqayS5hrXyo1Uu_jg++zPCtsfAPWyDgiA@mail.gmail.com> <32688785-4C8D-4C03-8FA9-ECF42124639A@mac.com>
Watch out, a personal note!
There is an aspect of suing photographers which I haven't seen discussed in
this
thread, and it is somewhat unnerving. In the US, anyone can sue anyone at
anytime, for practically anything, and depending on the amount of money they
are
willing to spend, it can go on for quite a while.
I was sued, and a photograph of a building without humans or pets taken from
the
public sidewalk was part of the suit. It didn't matter that virtually the
same
image was on a public site, this was a thought offense. The attorney doing
the
suing had the treasury of a wealthy non-profit behind him and hired a large
upscale law firm and fought on with increasing desperation for three years.
One
of the plaintiffs, the non-profit, finally settled and publicly apologized,
the
other settled.
Then the attorney instigating the suit and the firm which he hired then
separately sued the non-profit, who counter-sued, and this went on for a
couple
of more years, thankfully without me. Years later, the non-profit awarded
me a
medal of merit.
So be careful out there!
John
<http://www.numismaticnews.net/article/settlement_in_cipoletti_case>
Replies:
Reply from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
In reply to:
Message from scleroplex at gmail.com (scleroplex) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from bcaldwell51 at earthlink.net (Bryan Caldwell) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a photographer sued)