Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]so now the only reason to use low iso is for shallow depth of field is that so Jay? rric On May 31, 2013, at 3:30 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote: > > On May 31, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: > >> ISO 12800: >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/jayanand/OddsAndEnds/D4Test/12800.JPG.html >> >> ISO 18100: >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/jayanand/OddsAndEnds/D4Test/18100.JPG.html >> >> ISO 25600: >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/jayanand/OddsAndEnds/D4Test/25600.JPG.html >> >> Please see LARGE. >> >> Discussions welcome. > > It would appear that this is the current "one-to-beat" in the realm of > "high ISO." > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information