Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gene, Thanks for all the valuable advice. I have decided to buy it after a session on the streets today. It comes with a 16GB Sony XQD card and reader. Cheers Jayanand On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:21 PM, <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote: > +1, only my results matter. > > Gene > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jayanand Govindaraj" <jayanand at gmail.com> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2013 5:28:06 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: [Leica] D4 High ISO > > John, > Who cares? I am only worried whether I get the shot or not in the real > world, and I will use whatever tools that help me do so - 12 bit, 13 bit or > 14 bit. I fail to see how anybody without testing equipment can make out > the difference in any reasonably sized print. This conversation sounds as > if it is between equipment junkies, not photographers. IMHO totally > forgettable! > Cheers > Jayanand > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 2:10 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > wrote: > > > Found it > > > > > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=78677.msg632965#msg632965 > > > > john > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > I have been trying to find a link to a message on the LuLa forum I read > > this > > > week, it was scientific testing of colour response with cameras at > > increased > > > speed ratings. To keep good colour you should not take a D800 over > > 1600asa, > > > I think it was higher for the D4 and effectively unlimited on the Sony > > RX1, > > > once you went over a certain level (they were response graphs) the > colour > > > depth dropped. > > > > > > john > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > so now the only reason to use low iso is for shallow depth of field > > > > > > > > is that so Jay? > > > > > > > > rric > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 31, 2013, at 3:30 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 31, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> ISO 12800: > > > > >> http://gallery.leica- > > > > users.org/v/jayanand/OddsAndEnds/D4Test/12800.JPG.html > > > > >> > > > > >> ISO 18100: > > > > >> http://gallery.leica- > > > > users.org/v/jayanand/OddsAndEnds/D4Test/18100.JPG.html > > > > >> > > > > >> ISO 25600: > > > > >> http://gallery.leica- > > > > users.org/v/jayanand/OddsAndEnds/D4Test/25600.JPG.html > > > > >> > > > > >> Please see LARGE. > > > > >> > > > > >> Discussions welcome. > > > > > > > > > > It would appear that this is the current "one-to-beat" in the realm > > of > > > "high > > > > ISO." > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > George Lottermoser > > > > > george at imagist.com > > > > > http://www.imagist.com > > > > > http://www.imagist.com/blog > > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >