Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:41:25 -0400

Upgrade cost?
Are they going to take your  M9 for one on a discount?


On 6/3/13 6:40 PM, "Bob Adler" <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would just like to restate that the M240 is a wonderful M camera used in
> classic M mode. The addition of a larger sensor, increased ISO range,
> incredibly smooth and quiet shutter, terrifically visible range finder 
> lines
> and solid build (esp. baseplate), better ergonomics with menu selection
> placement and thumb rest, and no apparent loss of write speed all make it 
> an
> improvement over the M9 platform. The live view would be great for 
> landscapes
> to not only focus, but to see the impact of filters and DOF changes with
> apertures.
> 
> It is just, for my uses, currently not worth the upgrade cost from my M9.
> Bob
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:27 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
> 
>> It depends on what you shoot, fairly static stuff will be fine but I would
>> have my doubts about focussing on fast moving - I have not tried it yet. 
>> The
>> focus aid works best when zoomed in, but then everything is magnified and 
>> you
>> do not see the whole composition. The large magnification for focussing
>> becomes more of an issue the longer the lens.
>> 
>> I think you will have to try one to see if it works for your usage, mine 
>> is
>> set up that if focus ring is moved (or button on front pushed) it goes to 
>> x5
>> for focussing, then a light press on the release goes back to full view - 
>> it
>> is quicker than it may sound ;-)
>> 
>> At the end of the day it is not a dedicated system for R lenses so there 
>> will
>> be some compromise....
>> 
>> john
>> ________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> I'm really wondering now.  I'm still on the list for the M240 but it 
>> sounds
>> like it will be really frustrating to use.  Should I just stick with the 
>> R9
>> and DMR with my R lenses?  I thought the M240 was going to be a solution
>> for R lenses but the idea of Live View just drives me crazy!
>> 
>> Tina
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:12 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Bill Nelsch wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Wait a minute - are you suggesting that the 'shutter delay' is AFTER the
>>>> image is captured?
>>> 
>>> I'd think we're all discussing the time duration between
>>> depressing the "shutter button"
>>> and
>>> beginning the capture process.
>>> 
>>> Each camera has some delay
>>> whether involving simple mechanical movements of shutter parts and 
>>> mirrors
>>> or complex electro/mechanical movements of auto focus servo motors
>>> and/or exposure calculations
>>> or
>>> all of the above.
>>> 
>>> The more you ask the camera to do "for you"
>>> the longer the delay
>>> in my experience.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> George Lottermoser
>>> george at imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience)