Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:57:33 -0500
References: <C92D275D-3ED3-456B-A979-E9ECFE88DD40@mac.com> <D70230E2-9671-4A51-AC10-DF613D7CDED5@sfr.fr>
 
On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:59 AM, philippe.amard wrote:

> Repat the same experiment at, say, 12800 ISO ;-)

> Le 7 juin 13 ? 17:46, George Lottermoser a ?crit :
> 
>> <http://www.stephenbartelsgallery.com/blog/nikon-d800e-v-leica-m9.html>

Would if I could.
Wish I had both (or either) kits in my possession. ;~(

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting)
 In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting)