Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My Canon L zooms benefit from the micro adjustment for auto focus, but the primes seem OK as is, so far. I wonder where the auto-focus point was with the Nikon? Judging from the out-of-focus areas, I'm guessing it was not on the eyes. Ken -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of H&ECummer Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 5:38 PM To: lug at leica-users.org Subject: [Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting Hmmm, A new Nikon 50mm F1.4 G is less than $500 and a new 50mm Summilux Asph is $4,000. Perhaps there is some truth that you get what you pay for. :-) Also I have found that all my nikon lenses benefited from being auto focus fine tuned due to variations in assembly. Perhaps the 50 Nikkor in this test was not tuned to the body used. Just a thought. I have two Nikkor 50 f1.4 D lenses and they are both softer at f1.8 than my newly purchased and focus tuned 50mm F1.8 G. It cost me $220.00. Howard Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:57:33 -0500 From: George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> Subject: Re: [Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:59 AM, philippe.amard wrote: > Repat the same experiment at, say, 12800 ISO ;-) > Le 7 juin 13 ? 17:46, George Lottermoser a ?crit : > >> <http://www.stephenbartelsgallery.com/blog/nikon-d800e-v-leica-m9.htm >> l> Would if I could. Wish I had both (or either) kits in my possession. ;~( Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information