Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have read so many consistent anti RAID stuff on the LUG for so many years I'd not even use it to spray a bug. On 6/9/13 10:57 AM, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote: > No idea on the MTBF figures, may well be so. However OS in the same array > is what concerns me the most. Without that failure of a scratch drive is of > no importance at all. > Tina is very unlikely to set up any kind of RAID in any case so the point > is moot for what she want s to do and how she wants to go about it (having > a company build it for her) as a turnkey solution. > I'm definitely out of here ;-0 > > > *Breathe in, breathe out, move on* -- Jimmy Buffett > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > On 10 June 2013 00:51, mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com> wrote: > >> geof the mtbf of the ssd drives are very very low since there are no >> moving >> parts and much much better than hard drives, there is really >> no difference between using three separate drives when one fails, u loose >> all. the best way is raid 10 which is mirroring and striping , i use >> striped sdd for my os drives and every time something is updated, i do an >> image back up, data site on raid 5 disk system. my lr library and scratch >> disk are on the striped ssd and when i do major work , i back it up the >> the >> raid drive. >> ------------------------------------- >> regards, mehrdad >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/