Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica superiority or not
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:28:43 +0530
References: <51CBEC62.1010509@threshinc.com>

Peter,
The requirement for wide open shooting, IMHO, is also becoming quite
redundant in the age of digital today (for 99% of normal photography), as
such high quality low light (High ISO) performance is possible off the
sensor - as is obvious with the MM or M240 as well. I would much rather
carry around a f2.8 or f4 lens than a f1.4 lens if I can get away with it
because it would be lighter and smaller, and also have better performance
because of simpler construction. The only thing I give up, and that too
only with a DSLR, is a brighter viewfinder image. Because I have acquired a
Nikon D4, I am seriously considering switching my Nikon 70-200 f2.8 for the
f4 - it is one third of the weight and price, and it looks like (from MTF
Charts) performance is actually better. By the way, the Fuji lenses are
also excellent wide open...

Cheers
Jayanand


On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Peter Klein <pklein at threshinc.com> wrote:

>
> One thing about Leica lenses, though,  You can shoot wide open, and you
> know you're going to be OK. Not always true with the other brands.  Since I
> like to play in the dark, that matters to me.
>
> --Peter
>
>
>


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica superiority or not)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Leica superiority or not)
In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Leica superiority or not)