Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/06/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:37:15 -0500
References: <CDF22427.C4B8%mark@rabinergroup.com> <C699DA1D-7C88-4C01-80CB-54876990F609@mac.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9C56CD282@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>
On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:27 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> You do George, despite what I said about there being little difference in
> results (for my usage) between the M9 and M I have not shot with the M9 in
> the weeks since the M arrived....
I have followed everything you've said about the various camera bodies.
I wonder if you currently see any reason to keep the M9 - other than as fine
backup body?
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)