Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm very happy to use the 400 telyt on a Mark III guess the 560 would work just as well but i have no subject matter for it best simon On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Aram Langhans <leica_r8 op hotmail.com> wrote: > But I had a Rebel. Way lighter. > > -----Original Message----- From: Tina Manley > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 1:49 PM > > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses > > I just lifted both the R9 with DMR and the Canon 1DMII and the Canon is > heavier. > > Tina > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko op sympatico.ca> wrote: > > Yep, that's what did me in. The weight, for the functionality. >> >> Sure, a Tech Master kit is heavier, but, a Tech Master provides a 4x5 >> negative. >> >> But, when a DMR listed for sale, I am still tempted to look. >> >> ...Vick >> >> >> On 05/07/2013 4:21 PM, Aram Langhans wrote: >> >> I would have gone DMR except for one thing - the weight. ..... >>> >>> Aram >>> >>> >> >> ______________________________****_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/****mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug> >> <http://**leica-users.org/mailman/**listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>>for >> more information >> >> >> > > -- > Tina Manley > http://tina-manley.**artistwebsites.com<http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information >