Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] DMR+Leica R versus Canon+R Adapter
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:07:44 -0500
References: <mailman.1216.1373253253.1363.lug@leica-users.org> <9D1730D7-CED1-4672-B73B-A165C06D4FED@yahoo.com.sg>
 
On Jul 8, 2013, at 1:23 AM, David Ching wrote:

> it is even more obvious that the M240 is the only way to go. 

1) no auto diaphragm with that path either.
2) shutter delay using live view and/or EVF
3) view delay through EVF as well

making it, for all intent and purpose, a "tripod" camera when using R lenses.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] DMR+Leica R versus Canon+R Adapter)
 In reply to: Message from davidhhching at yahoo.com.sg (David Ching) ([Leica] DMR+Leica R versus Canon+R Adapter)