Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] An Observation
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:52:17 -0500
References: <7370268.1373393392490.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Yes, both sites use the same basic software, with a few different choices.

My point is that more people look at my images on the OM gallery than do on 
the LUG gallery.  About twice as many.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Montie" <montoid at earthlink.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] An Observation


> Not real sure what you are asking here, but your images usually look fine 
> on both sites (on my screen, anyway).
>
> Montie
>
>
>>When I post images made with Zuiko lenses, I post to the OM Gallery.  When 
>>I have images made with Leica lenses, I post to the LUG Gallery.  My email 
>>messages announcing these images go to both lists.
>>
>>I normally find that images posted to the OM Gallery get twice as many 
>>viewings as those posted to the LUG Gallery.  This is puzzling to me.
>>
>>Do OM listers browse the galleries, independent of recent posting 
>>messages?
>>
>>Or, AG, could there be a different tracking algorithm in play here?
>>
>>Jim Nichols
>>Tullahoma, TN USA
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




Replies: Reply from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] An Observation)
In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie) ([Leica] An Observation)