Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina, A nice record shot which looks more balanced, but the sky seems better in the first. The sad thing is scanned prints from good trannies will probably be better for colour rendition but will probably lose in other areas. Oh, and is very expensive to boot. They should have had digital in 1989! What do you want to achieve, Tina? You've probably told us but the volume on the list, and my age, swamp out my retention capacities. I understand that you have over 1000 slides, but surely not all of then need to be scanned? Even for a book, would a 100/150 defining images not be better? And particularly with the scanning difficulties imposed by Kodachrome! I'm nonplussed.... Douglas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> To: <MUGers at yahoogroups.com>; "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>; "paw" <paw at micapeak.com>; "seephoto" <seephoto at micapeak.com>; "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus at thomasclausen.net> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 8:12 PM Subject: [Leica] IMG: The Dock, Redo > PESO: > > I couldn't resist going back and redoing the K14 scan that I've had the > most problems with using the Camera Raw filter. > > Here is before: > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/151212364 > > Here is after: > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/151267372 > > Better? > > TIA > > Tina > > -- > Tina Manley > http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >