Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No difference between the X-Pro 1 and X-E 1. The 60mm is an excellent lens, only a slower focusing one. I think the Fuji X series is introducing many non Nikon users to the huge advantage of being able to crank up the ISO without much of a quality degradation in an image. Nikon users have had that experience for a few years now. Cheers Jayanand On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:34 AM, David Ching <davidhhching at yahoo.com.sg> wrote: > I must be one of those old-timers! > > Was one of the early adopters of the Fuji X Pro 1 who paid a premium at > Usd1700 body only more than a year ago. Got the 35mm and later a Metabones > adapter. So satisfied with the low light low noise sensor that I sold off > my Nikon D700 which was only 6 months old then. > > Still only using the 35mm but now with the Fuji M adapter with the Leica, > Zeiss and Voightlander lenses. Read elsewhere that the 60mm is slower and > less sharp than the 35mm. Use the Fuji X100S too which covers the wider > fields especially with the 28mm effective extension lens. F stop not > affected by an additional lens. > > Very unlikely to get the X-E1 so can't tell the difference if any in terms > of output from the respective Fuji lenses compared with the XPro 1. Anyone > else who can? > > > David Ching > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information