Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/08/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] RED
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 14:41:17 -0700
References: <9C6AE992-BB9F-46CC-9FAC-BCC022466B6B@gmail.com><FEF8572FA5F4448D94D7AE928A91EB88@syneticfeba505> <C2155F26-7C4D-4FC3-B571-597BC66C93F2@gmail.com> <6C4413DC5EB84C9CA114309AABFFD741@syneticfeba505>
 
On Aug 2, 2013, at 2:12 PM, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:

> Steve Barbour ASKED:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] RED
> 
> 
>> Ted, do these have to be brand new pics?<<<
> 
> Hi Steve,
> That was the plan as it would be a "new assignment" for those giving it a 
> try. They in turn would then deliberately have to go seek and find / shoot 
> the new subject.
> 
> I hope this helps?


yes


thanks

Steve




> 
> cheers,
> ted
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] RED)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] RED)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] RED)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] RED)