Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Very good, Gene, as those are the two lens lengths (and speeds) that I would likely be using. Thanks much! Jeffery On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:27 AM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote: > Jeff, > > My non-coded lenses are just that, I have not bothered codeing them even > though I have the M8 set for coded lenses. I have only 2 coded lenses > which were coded when I bought them, both wide lenses. I have not had any > issues with the non-coded lenses, and get excellent results from them > (35/1.4 pre-Asph, and a 50/2 Summicron). > > Gene > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342 at gmail.com> > To: "Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 11:16:27 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: [Leica] Coding of lenses for use on the M8 > > I would just do a search on the LUG archives for this question, but I > cannot get the search function to work on the LUG archive site on any of > my computers lately. > > I assume that most of you who use non-coded lenses on your M8 don't send > them back to the faculty for a retro fitting. What is the favored method > of coding your lenses? Is there an affordable way to do it without using a > Sharpie? Chances are, I'll just keep a 35/2 tethered to the M8 most of the > time. > > Thanks in advance, > > Jeffery > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information