Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Naptime
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:55:20 +0000
References: <2128E030-2885-4895-A4F4-EA8D0A717B0C@comcast.net>

Woosh? Say it (2') out loud - 2 foot.....

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Alan wrote:
> 
> "I also love this.
> You must have been focused at 2'.
> And this is one case where color does captures the sole  ;~) Alan"
> 
> Thank you, Alan, for taking the time to give this image a more than cursory
> glance.
> 
> Because I was intrigued by your comment about the perception of a close
> focusing distance, I walked down the street to the same location from where
> I had photographed the "Naptime" image, and focused the M8+90mm on
> the car that was parked there this morning.
> 
> The distance scale of the Elmarit 90 does not show any discrete values
> between 25' and infinity. The focusing distance was a bit more than 25'.
> 
> I can think of two factors that in combination might create a perception of
> closeness: 1) the 90 on the M8 acts as a 120mm lens and 2) the posted image
> was cropped to 2100x2100 from the 3600x2400 DNG.
> 
> Neither of these two factors changes the perspective which would have
> been noticeably different from a camera distance of 2'.
> 
> Submitted in the spirit of a conversation,
> 
> Oliver
> 


In reply to: Message from oliverbryk at comcast.net (Bryk Oliver) ([Leica] IMG: Naptime)