Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gerry, stick around! Geoff, I look at any "M" shots I can find with great interest. The M is made of Unobtanium now, but eventually that element will decay into magnesium. Not sure what the half-life is, though. I'm still shooting my M8, despite the fact that the bulk of my pictures have been Oly E-M5 lately. I have Leica lenses, Cosina lenses, Olympus lenses, and I'm not afraid to use any of them. I do not discriminate according to race, religion, national origin or camera choice. I look at everybody's pictures even if I don't comment much. I value the friendships I've made here, and I do wish the family wouldn't bicker. Most of us use or have used Leicas. Most of us also use other stuff. It's OK. Really. --Peter Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > Caution technical chat follows ;-) > FWIW anyone that really likes their M8/9 for what they are great at will > really love the M. I've only shot about 500 frames with mine so far due to > personal circumstances but it is in every way a more refined M9 if you like. > I plan to give it a comprehensive exercising in Barcelona over the next > couple of weeks. I don't bother talking about it on the list because there > doesn't seem to be much overt interest and only a few in LUG hands thus far > of course. > The pro segment for Hasselblad/Phase One and S is so small, almost none of > us are likely to be involved. There are pluses and minuses for each system > and the handling and lenses are particularly good with the S. > But the M9 and M are better studio cameras than the S2 and S are street > cameras ;-) > > Cheers, > Geoff Hopkinson > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman