Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]AMEN Dr. Ted! > Damn that's so easy! :-) Pictures look great? Smile and carry on! All > testing questions answered! Cheers Lluis El 14/09/2013, a las 01:25, tedgrant at shaw.ca escribi?: > Robert Adler OFFERED & ASKED: > Subject: [Leica] Hypothetical Nocti Question > > >> Hypothetically speaking: >> Assuming that you take an image that you like (so it's not the equipment, >> but the photographer)... >> If you took that image on the M9 vs the M(Type 240) at f/1 with a Gen 4 >> Nocti >> Question 1: Would you notice a difference in a print that is 10x12, >> assuming no crop? >> Question 2: Would you notice a difference if you had to crop the image by >> 1/3ish for a 10x12 print? >> Question 3: Would it be a good idea to just keep the Noctilux glued to the >> M9 and use other lenses on the M if, the answers to 1 and 2 above "no" or >> "who cares"? >> >> Thanks for your patience with this hypothetical...:-) > > Hi Bob, > Me being me when these kinds of questions come up and I only have an M8 > and a Noctilux f.1.0, circa 1961? " WHO CARES?" ;-) ;-) My usual answer > for this kind of query? :-) > > I think anyone making a judgment on your question without the identical > equipment you describe to actually do some physical testing and blow-ups. > At least 13X20 or larger? > > Anything offered without some type of visual printed test along those > lines? Their offerings, I imagine? Should be taken with a large helping of > salt! No? > > Other wise just take camera in hand with the never ending beautiful > Noctilux and go merrily along clicking to your hearts content! :-) > > Damn that's so easy! :-) Pictures look great? Smile and carry on! All > testing questions answered! > > cheers, > Dr. ted ;-) ;-) > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information