Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Interesting and the WA is not 35 and 50 but wider. 16-18-21. As I'd put that in wrong. What if they made one 16-23-42 !?!? I get Lost thinking about it. I went to the Chelsea Bow Tie Cinema to see "in a world" just now and they were having a grand opening of "Rush." they were letting out as I was arriving. A red formula one Ferrari was parked outside behind a police barricade with all kinds of lights on it and 5 security guards. I got a few dozen shots at f8 of the car and a few people with my iso not maxing out at 6400 but right around 4000 I think. With a 50 1.8. The red was amping out my monitor on the back of my camera. Was told by the costume guy I just missed a bunch of cool celebs his favorite Courtney Love from my home town Portland OR. - he said looked quite tall and good. How can I get on that movie opening mailing list? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2424934/Courtney-Love-darling-d emure-bondage-dress-attends-screening-Rush.html or http://tinyurl.com/mmt6quh On 9/19/13 12:32 AM, "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> wrote: > No. > It is not a zoom lens. The elements are only in place to create a sharp > lens > at the 3 detent points, the in between points are not optically correct. > The WATE OTOH is continuous from 16 to 21 mm > > On 19 Sep, 2013, at 00:04, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > >> If you were going from 35 to 50 and you just backup up a bit wouldn't you >> be >> around 40? > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/