Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I hope I'm not flogging a dead horse. This really arose as a consequence of my asking about camera shake with 90mm lens on an M9. Let me start by quoting from memory something that Dr. Ted wrote quite a long time ago. He said that once he got an M7 he stopped using previous M's and used aperture preferred, thus being able to concentrate on the subject and not wasting time on getting correct exposure. As part of the reaction to my query about camera shake, Bob Adler suggested that I try Auto ISO and I began a series of experiments in the hope of figuring out how it worked. In Aperture Preferred, you set the ISO, you pick the aperture, and the camera automatically gives you a correct exposure by choosing the shutter speed. But suppose you are in action situations where you are not as concerned with picking the aperture as with picking the shutter speed. You would like to have Shutter Speed Preferred, but Leica does not do that. Well, you have an even better world: choose both the aperture and shutter speed and let Leica give you automatic exposure by setting the ISO if you at the same time choose Auto ISO. I created a set of test exposures. They are all labeled with what they are. There are three sets: 1. All seven stops from f/2 to f/16 in three groups: Aperture Preferred at ISO 160, Auto ISO with Aperture Preferred, and Auto ISO with shutter at 1/500. My conclusion was that the combination of Aperture Preferred and Auto ISO was pretty useless for me. It must have been intended for Point and Shoot folks. Here are two glitches in my examples, one of them inconsequential. When you look at the EXIF, you will see focal length 35mm. I forgot to manually set it to 90; I was using a 90mm lens. The only effect of this was to set the minimum shutter speed in the last group to 1/35 since I picked minimum shutter speed to be lens related: 1/f. This had no effect on these examples. The other glitch was that apparently Auto ISO does not take ISO below 160, a fact I discovered in this experiment; the Leica Manual does not mention it. So the shots at f/2 and f/2.8 at 1/500 are overexposed. I should have posted each shot as a separate picture. Instead, I thought an album would be more convenient for viewers. I entered each shot in sequence, and it looks like the album software shuffled them into some random order. However, every shot is fully labeled. Here are the links: http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/herbk1/Auto+ISO+Test/?g2_page=1 http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/herbk1/Auto+ISO+Test/?g2_page=2 Finally, I must say that the section of the Leica Manual on Auto ISO is sadly deficient. Oh, and I almost forgot to mention: exposure compensation works with Auto ISO. Herbert Kanner kanner at acm.org 650-326-8204 Question authority and the authorities will question you.