Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, I picked up the newly revised Voigtlander 50/1.5 Nokton from > Stephen Gandy a short while back, but haven't had a break at work long > enough to allow me to use it. have you used the Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f1.1 ? Impression? > > Jeffery > > > On Oct 21, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> you guys need to talk with Jeffery Smith >> >> >> >> s >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 21, 2013, at 12:09 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> >> wrote: >> >>> I have a quantity of 50mm lenses (my most used focal length) from 1950s >>> DR to current FLE, they all have a different look with good and bad >>> points for each ;-) >>> >>> john >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> Overgaard ranks the various 50 mm lenses with the best being the latest >>>> with >>>> a floating element. Bear in mind that the differences are subtile and >>>> certainly >>>> not apparent on a computer screen. In fact I doubt that you could see >>>> any >>>> difference in lens quality short of examining a really large sized >>>> paper print. A >>>> good read, though. Thanks, Steve. >>>> Larry Z >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information