[Leica] Some Nikon vs Leica lens results......

[richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)]

For me (i.e. may not apply to other people), the best thing about the Leica
M system is that once the bucks are spent, there is no actual need to use /
try other systems For example, I have had the Epson R-D1, the M8 briefly
and the M9 serially. I also have an E-3 for event stuff.

I have never felt the need to chase Nikon this and that, or Fuji this and
that.


On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:17 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> Just imagine how much better  the current Leica 28mm Elmarit/Summicron and
> 35mm Summicron/Summilux would be ;-)
>
> Size / weight / cost should also come into account.....
>
> John
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > >
> > > Lenses:
> > >
> > > Leica : WATE, 3E,50 ASPH Lux, 90 Elmarit M
> > >
> > > Nikon: 18AIS, 18-35 AFS, 24-85 G, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.4 G
> > >
> > > The 3E at 50 mm was very weak.  But best at 28 and 35 for this
> grouping.
> > >
> > > Frank Filippone
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto