Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:11:25 +0000
References: <20131028224852.60DE053C182@barracuda.rutabaga.org> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9D0D6FF69@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>, <CA+yJO1AxDG1ZASuxbs2zx8Hrur-NO4mZBuWo7mPSdCN2YFp2Rg@mail.gmail.com>

Same as on film cameras but you have to use LV or EVF in the close range to 
see what you are focussing on.

Which 35/1.4? If an asph then the 50 Summilux asph will give a similar look, 
if pre-asph the DR Summicron or 50 Summilux pre-asph will be more similar - 
of course you realise you need the full set ;-)

john
________________________________________


 A DR Summicron that has been operated on works well on the M240?  In the
close range?  Details, please.

I am looking for something smaller and lighter than the Noctilux.  I love
my Noctilux but I don't always need 1.0 and the size does keep me from
using it as often as the 35/1.4 which is my normal lens to keep on the M240
or the MM but the 50 would give a little more reach and a "normal"
perspective.

Thanks,

Tina


On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:00 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> A DR Summicron like that works well on the M (240) in the close range :-)
>
> What are the reasons for looking for something other than the Noctilux?
> Anything other than the Noctilux asph will be smaller/lighter but the DR
> and pre-asph Summilux give a look more like the f1.0 Noctilux than the
> Summilux asph does.....
>
> john
> ________________________________________
>
>
> Tina:
> I also have a Dual-Range Summicron. I sent it to DAG, who ground off the
> close-focus cam (the one used with the "eyes." I think it cost $80.  So now
> it fits on my M8 and should fit on any other digital M.  I sold the eyes..
>  So now I have a lens I can use on my digital M instead of a lens I can
> only use when I shoot film, which I don't.
>
> For a while I thought it was wrong to defile such an elegant mechanical
> object. Then I decided: Lenses are to be used.  Food for thought.
>
> Peter
> -------------
> Tina wrote:
> Yes, the Noctilux is my only practical 50.  I have a Summicron that has the
> eyes, but I don't think that fits on anything current.  I probably use my
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


--
Tina Manley
http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail was checked for spam by the freeware edition of CleanMail.
The freeware edition is restricted to personal and non-commercial use.
You can remove this notice by purchasing a commercial license:
http://antispam.byteplant.com/products/cleanmail/index.html


In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux)