Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Tina for the explanation. A fully detached retina is serious that's why I asked. My son had that happen 3 years ago and had to undergo 5 surgeries :( Scott > On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: > > I'm probably describing it wrong. It is a membrane which has detached from > the retina. I saw a specialist about it three years ago and they were > waiting for it to completely detach because there is a danger it will tear > the macula as it detaches. It's good news that has detached without > tearing. From Wiki: > > A *posterior vitreous detachment (PVD)* is a condition of the eye in which > the vitreous membrane <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitreous_membrane> > separates > from the retina <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retina>. It refers to the > separation of the posterior hyaloid membrane from the retina anywhere > posterior to the vitreous base > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitreous_base> (a > 3-4mm wide attachment to the ora > serrata<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ora_serrata>.) > Synchysis: there is associated vitreous liquefaction. Syneresis: there is > collapse of the vitreous due to collection of synchytic fluid between the > posterior hyaloid membrane and the internal limiting membrane of the > retina. > > Broadly speaking, the condition is common for older adults and over 75% of > those over the age of 65 develop it. Although less common among people in > their 40s or 50s, the condition is not rare for those individuals. Some > research has found that the condition is more common among > women.[1]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posterior_vitreous_detachment#cite_note-1> > [2] > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posterior_vitreous_detachment#cite_note-2> > > The vitreous <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitreous_humour> > (Latin="glassy") > is a gel which fills the eye <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_eye> > behind > the lens <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_(anatomy)>. Between it and the > retina <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retina> is the vitreous > membrane<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitreous_membrane>. > Over time the vitreous changes, shrinking and developing pockets of > liquefaction, similar to the way a > gelatin<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gelatin> dessert > shrinks, or detaches, from the edge of a pan over time. At some stage the > vitreous membrane may peel away from the retina. This is usually a sudden > event, but may also occur slowly over months. > > Age and refractive error play a role in determining the onset of PVD in a > healthy person. PVD is rare in > emmetropic<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmetropic> people > under the age of 40 years, and increases with age to 86% in the 90s. > Several studies have found a broad range of incidence of PVD, from 20% of > autopsy cases to 57% in a more elderly population of patients (average age > was 83.4 years). > > People with myopia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myopia> (nearsightedness) > greater than 6 diopters <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diopters> are at > higher risk of PVD at all ages. Posterior vitreous detachment does not > directly threaten vision. Even so, it is of increasing interest because the > interaction between the vitreous body and the retina might play a decisive > role in the development of major pathologic vitreoretinal conditions, such > as epiretinal membrane <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiretinal_membrane>. > > > Probably more than you want to know! > > > Tina > > >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Scott Gregory <scottgregory at mac.com> >> wrote: >> >> Tina I thought a detached retina meant one cannot see?? >> >> Scott >> >>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: >>> >>> Great news from the eye doctor! The reason my glasses don't work any >> more >>> is because they are way too strong. My eyes have gotten better ;-) In >>> fact, I can probably do without glasses for focusing my Leica because my >>> left eye only needs -.75 and I think the Leica already has -.5 built in, >>> right? I'm going to try it anyway. As soon as the eye drops wear off. >> I >>> can't see anything right now! >>> >>> The detaching retina which was pulling on the macular part of my eye has >>> completely detached, which is a good thing. It's not stretching anymore >>> and there is no danger of a hole in the macula. >>> >>> New glasses on order but won't be ready until after the trip to Italy. >>> >>> Thanks for all of the advice! >>> >>> >>> Tina >>> >>> -- >>> Tina Manley >>> http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > -- > Tina Manley > http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information